Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Assessment of Temporal Processing – Is it Worth the Time?
  • Instructional Course presented to:
  • American Academy of Audiology
  • April 5, 2003


  • Robert W. Keith, Ph.D.
  • University of Cincinnati
2
FUNDAMENTALS OF AUDITORY ANALYSIS
  •   Frequency  -  Pitch
  •   Intensity     -  Loudness
  •   Duration     -  Time
3
Temporal Processing as a
Cortical Function
4
Temporal Processing Disorders
  • Time   not  Lobe!



5
Models of CAPD
  • Tallal -
  • Temporal processing disorder:
  • The inability to accurately perceive auditory signals of brief duration when presented at rapid rates.
6
Four Hypotheses explaining CAPD
Jerger (1998) Seminars in Hearing
  • Auditory Memory Deficit
  • Auditory Sequencing Deficit
  • Temporal Resolution Deficit
  • Figure Ground Deficit


7
Models of CAPD
  • Keith model of CAPD


  • Neurologic abnormalities/maturational delays
  • Temporal processing deficits
  • Deficient selective listening/channel separation
  • Deficient auditory processing in noise


8
A conceptual framework for auditory processing/language disorders
  • Language employs pitch, duration, and rhythm
  • Tonal and temporal characteristics  . . . have consequences for auditory processing and language learning (from Chelfant-Evans, 2000)
  •  As a result we are interested in identifying the basis of disorders of pitch, duration (time) and rhythm
9
A conceptual framework for auditory processing/language disorders
  • Grammatical morphemes with short duration pose problems  for speech-language impaired children (Drommi et al., 1993)
  • We are interested in identifying temporal processing disorders in children who are unable to hear short duration morphemes
10
A conceptual framework for auditory processing/language disorders: Phonologic working memory
  • Acoustic, temporal (timing) and sequential aspects of sound are represented in a sensory trace (echoic memory) before fading.
  • The sensory trace is translated into “phonologic coding” and stored into long term memory (Cowan, 1995)
  • We are interested in identifying disorders of short term memory and temporal processing.
11
Central Auditory Processes
Responsible for the following Phenomenon (ASHA, 1996)
  • Sound localization and lateralization
  • Auditory discrimination
  • Auditory pattern recognition
  • Temporal aspects of audition
  • -Temporal resolution
  • -Temporal masking
  • -Temporal ordering
  • Performance with competing signals
  • Performance with degraded signals
12
Bruton Conference (JAAA 2000) Definition of APD
  •    An auditory processing disorder (APD) is defined as a deficit in the processing of information in the auditory modality.
13
Bruton Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis
of APD in School-Aged Children:
 Minimal APD Test Battery
  • Behavioral measures
    • Pure tone audiometry
    • P-I functions for word recognition
    • Dichotic task (digits, words, and/or sentences)
    • Duration pattern sequence test
    • Temporal gap detection
  • Electrophysiologic measures
    • Immittance audiometry
    • Otoacoustic emissions
    • ABR
    • MLR
    • P300 (optional)



14
Temporal Processing Disorders
  • We try to identify timing disorders in the auditory system to explain why some patients have difficulty with auditory discrimination, phonics, and reading.


  • With this information appropriate remediation can be implemented.
15
Acoustic Spectrum of “Mouth”
16
Acoustic Spectrum of “sing”
17
Temporal Processing Disorders
  • i.e.  Tests for disorders of auditory timing
18
Tests of Temporal Processing Abilities

  • ABR – Click Rate Function
  • Temporal Integration – Brief Tone Audiometry (Zwislocki, 1960 – Wright, 1968)
  • Acoustic Reflex Latency Tests (Garza)
  • Masking Level Differences (Wilson et al. 1994)
  • Auditory Fusion Test-Revised                     (McCroskey and Keith 1996)
  • Random Gap Detection Test (Keith 2000)
  • Time Compressed Sentence Test (Keith2002)
  • Duration Patterns Test (Musiek, 1994)
19
Auditory Brainstem Responses
Click Rate Function
  • Wave V latency increases ~ .10 msec for every 10/sec increase in click rate
  • Click rate changes cause abnormally long latencies in patients with brainstem lesions
  • ABR click rate function may be used to study temporal processing disorders at the brainstem level
20
Temporal Integration
(Temporal Auditory Summation)
  • Auditory threshold decreases as tone duration increases (Zwislocki, 1960)
  • Normal threshold decrease is 10dB with duration increase from 20 to 200 msec
  • Temporal integration is “absent” in cochlear lesions (Wright 1968, 1969)
  • Brief tone audiometry may be used to study temporal processing at the level of the cochlea
21
Masking Level Differences
  • Measures brain stem level function
  • Binaural release from masking is approximately 5 to 12 dB depending on stimuli
  • Test materials available on VA CD 2.0
  • Few norms available for children
  • No current clinical application for remediation beyond understanding the auditory system.
22
VA CD Recording for Auditory Perceptual Assessment: Disc 2.0
  • MLD’s for Spondees and Broadband Noise
  • Dichotic Listening to Musical Cords
  • Dichotic Listening to Speech:  Digits, Sentences, and Nonsense Syllables
  • Low- and High-Pass Filtered NU-6
  • Frequency and Duration Pattern Tests
  • Time Compression and Time Compression plus Reverberation on NU-6
23
MLD for Spondaic Words in
2000-msec Bursts of Broadband Noise (Wilson et al.1994)

  • Antiphasic condition w/ speech and noise 180 degrees out of phase
  • Ten 500 msec spondaic words embedded into
  • 2000-msec noise bursts
  • Mean MLD- 9.5 dB (+/- 1.1 dB)
24
Wichita Auditory Fusion Test

Robert McCroskey
(1984)
25
Auditory Fusion Test-Revised (AFT-R)
McCroskey and Keith, 1996
  • Purpose:  To investigate temporal aspects of audition by measuring the auditory fusion threshold of tone pairs separated in time between 0 and 300 msec.
26
Auditory Fusion Test-Revised
McCroskey and Keith 1996
  • Five Frequencies
  • Three subtests
  • Tone pairs with ISI 0-300 msec
  • Auditory fusion is ISI when two tones are heard as one
  • Normal AF - 10 msec + or - 4
  • AFT-R may be useful for studying temporal processing disorders at the cortical level
27
Auditory Fusion Test-Revised
McCroskey RL and Keith RW (1996)

  • Screening AFT 0-300 mSec (ascending)
  • Standard AFT 0-40 mSec*
  • Expanded AFT 40-300 mSec*


  • *ascending and descending
28
AFT-R Normative Data
29
Comments on the AFT-R
  • Test takes a long time to administer
  • Ascending intervals may be predictable
  • Some frequencies do not provide useful diagnostic information
  • Provides information on temporal processing up to 300 msec.
30
Random Gap Detection Test
- The next generation
Keith (2000)
  • Purpose:  To investigate temporal aspects of audition by measuring the auditory fusion threshold of tone pairs or clicks separated in time between 0 and 40 msec.
31
Random Gap Detection
Test (RGDT)
Keith (2000)
  • Tone pairs at 500, 1000, 2000
  •    and 4000 Hz and pairs of clicks.


  •  Time intervals (gaps) between
  •     stimuli range from 0 to 40 msec.
32
Random Gap Detection Test
Keith (2000)
  • Example of inter-stimulus interval (gap) order of presentation in msec:


  • 20  -  2  -  40  -  5  -  10  -  25  -  15  -  0  -  30
33
Random Gap Detection Test
1000 Hz
  • (Keith, 2000)
  • Recorded by Auditec of St. Louis
  • Bill Carver, Ph.D.


34
Random Gap Detection Test
4000 Hz
  • (Keith, 2000)
  • Recorded by Auditec of St. Louis
  • Bill Carver, Ph.D.
35
Random Gap Detection Test
(RGDT) Keith (2000)
  • The gap detection threshold is defined as the time interval at which the stimuli are detected as two tones rather than one.
  • A gap detection threshold >20 msec. is considered abnormal indicating a temporal processing disorder.
36
RGDT Normative Data (2001)
  • Mean of each age group:

    age 5: 4.2
    age 6: 3.5
    age 7: 9.5
    age 8: 5.5
    age 9: 7.2
    age 10: 9.6
    age 11: 6.8
    age 12: 8.7
  • SD  of each age group:

    age 5:
    age 6:
    age 7: 4.1
    age 8: 4.4
    age 9: 4.5
    age 10: 4.5
    age 11: 2.7
    age 12:


37
RGDT Normative Data (2001)
38
Random Gap Detection Test - Expanded
(RGDT) Keith (2000)
  • Intended for individuals whose gap detection threshold exceeds 40 msec.
  • Includes time intervals between 50 and 300 msec.
  • Administered in the same manner as the RGDT
  • Useful as “practice” for administering the RGDT


39
RGDT – Hints for scoring
  • Instruct, demonstrate, and practice include RGDT Expanded
  • Administer the “practice”
  • Repeat until sure that instructions are understood
  • Ignore obvious outliers
  •     20  -  2  -  40  -  5  -  10  -  25  -  15  -  0  -  30
  • Move to Expanded if unable to respond to 40 msec.
  • Abandon the test if child is totally random for everything


40
RGDT Click Stimuli
  • “A screening test procedure should include the following elements  . . . . . . a gap-detection test in which a short silent gap is inserted in a burst of broad band noise.”  (Jerger and Musiek, 2000).
41
Time Compressed Sentence Test
42
Time Compressed Speech
  • Time compression above 50% results in marked loss of speech discrimination
  • Optimal time compression of 50% agrees with assumptions that 50% of natural speech is redundant
  • Time compressed speech can be used to assess information processing speed (Letowski & Poch, 1996)
  • Time compression results in degraded speech signal, but does not assess temporal processing as such
43
Time Compressed Words
(Wilson et al. 1994)
  • NU No. 6 monosyllable words
  • Female speaker
  • Time compressed at 45 and 65%
  • Slope of function between 20 and 80% correct is 2.8% per dB at 45% compression and 2.0% per dB at 65% compression
44
Time Compressed Sentence Test
  • Measures a child’s response to meaningful sentences that are time compressed at 40% and 60%
  • The only other available time compressed test utilizes monosyllable words.
  • Time compressed sentences are a more realistic stimuli since they represents typical speech more normally
45
Time Compressed Sentence Test:
What does it measure?
  • Test of temporal processing
    • Inability to hear rapid format frequency transitions
    • Inability to process auditory information at rapid rates of speech
    • May correlate with gap detection thresholds
  • Test of degraded speech
    • Distorted speech similar in concept to filtered words and auditory figure ground





46
Time Compressed Sentence Test
(Keith 2002)
  • One list of practice sentences at 0% TC
  • Two lists of sentences TC at 40%
  • Two lists of sentences TC at 60%
  • Each TC list preceded by 2 practice sentences


  • Available from Auditec of St. Louis
47
Time Compressed Sentence Test:
Example of 40% TC
  • Mother / cut / the bread.
  • The boy / fell / in the water.
  • The dog / caught / a rabbit.
  • Father / drives / a car.
  • The girl / helped / her mother.
48
Time Compressed Sentence Test: Example of 60% TC
  • The woman / washed / the floor.
  • The cat / chased / a mouse.
  • The baby / hurt / his finger.
  • Mother / sent for / the doctor.
  • The duck  / swam / on the water.


49
Time Compressed Sentence Test (Keith 2002)
  • Mother made a cake.
  • The boys played football.
  • The mother cut the bread.
  • The boy fell in the water.
  • Father drives a car.
  • The girl helped her mother
  • Etc.
  • Recorded and available from Auditec of St. Louis


50
Time Compressed Sentence Test
 (Keith 2000): Scoring
  • Three points for each sentence repeated
  • correctly, one point deducted for each
  • section of the sentence (subject, object, or predicate) misinterpreted or not heard.
  • The score is reported in percent


51
Time Compressed Sentence Test:
Normative Data
  • Data collection by 11 Beta sites across the USA, in multiple geographic regions and among various racial, ethnic, and socio-economic groups.
52
Time Compressed Sentence Test
  • Normative data obtained by 13 audiologists
  • 7 States
  • 3 University clinic
  • 4 Public school setting
  • 2 Private practice
53
Time Compressed Sentence Test: Normative Data
  • Subjects in each age group from 6 to 9 years and age 10+11.
  • All attended regular classrooms
  • Normal hearing and middle ear function.
  • Native speakers of English
54
Time Compressed Sentence Test:
Subjects
  • N = 163
  • 76 boys and 87 girls
  • Race
    • White  = 119
    • Black  = 16
    • Hispanic  = 19
    • Asian = 1
    • Native American = 1
    • Multiracial = 7
55
Time Compressed Sentence Test:
Subjects by age
  • Six years   =    21
  • Seven years =  35
  • Eight years =  39
  • Nine years =  37
  • Ten-eleven years = 31
  • Total = 163
56
Time Compressed Sentence Test
  • 3.3 points scored for each correct sentence.
  • One point deduced for each section missed.
  • Score converted to percent (%) correct.
57
Scoring the Time Compressed
Sentence Test:
Example at 40% TC
  • Mother / cut / the bread.   - 0
  • The boy / fell - swam/ in the water.  - 1
  • The dog / caught / a rabbit.   - 1
  • Father / drives / a car.   - 2
  • The girl / helped / her mother.  -3
58
Time Compressed Sentence Test:
Scoring and Interpretation
  • Raw scores in number of errors
  • Convert to percent correct
  • Interpret as normal, borderline, or abnormal performance
  • Look up Z-scores and percentiles
  • Convert percentiles to Standard Scores
  • Analysis of ear differences
59
 
60
Time Compressed Sentence Test:
Mean performance by age and condition
61
Time Compressed Sentence Test:
Standard Deviation
62
Time Compressed Sentence Test  - Spanish Version
Keith (2002)
63
Examples of TCST-
Spanish Sentences
  • 1 -  El policía / persiguió / al ladrón.
  • 2 -  Algunos rancheros / crían / vacas.
  • 3 -  El cartero / trae / las cartas.
  • 4 -  El profesor / contó / la historia.
  • 5 -  La niña / compró / un vestido nuevo.
64
TCST-Spanish Version
Normative Data
  • Data is being collected by  - - -
65
Duration Pattern Test
(Musiek, et al, 1990)
  • Three 1000 Hz tones and two 300 msec intertone intervals
  • Tones are 250 or 500 msec in duration
  • Six possible combinations of the three-tone sequence (LLS, LSL, LSS, SLS, SLL, SSL)
  • VA CD contains 60 patterns (6 patterns and 10 randomizations w/ 6-sec interpattern intervals
66
Duration Patterns Test
(Musiek et al, 1990)
  • Effective in identifying temporal lobe lesions, among others
  • DPT may be used to study temporal processing at cortical levels


67
Duration Patterns Test
 (Musiek, et al, 1990)
  • LSS     __________     _____     _____
  • SLS     _____     __________     _____
  • SSL     _____     _____     __________
  • LLS     __________     __________     _____
  • LSL     __________     _____     __________
  • SLL     _____     __________     __________
68
Duration Patterns Test
Musiek et al (1990)
  • Performance below 70% correct is considered abnormal, indicating cortical based APD.
  •   No normative data have been developed for children.
69
Frequency Patterns Test
  • Musiek, FE.   (1994)


  • Frequency (Pitch) and Duration Pattern Tests.


  • Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Volume 5 (4),  265– 268.
70
Frequency Patterns Test
  • Three Tone Burst Patterns
  • LHL, HLH,LLH, HHL, HLL,LHH
  • If first 14 of 15 responses are correct stop the test, if not, continue to 30 items.


  • (Musiek, 1994, Frequency and Duration Pattern Test, JAAA, 5: 265)


71
Frequency Patterns Test: 
Normative Cut-off Scores
  •   AGE         LE           RE          
       8yrs        40%        40%
       9 yrs       65%        65%
     10 yrs       72%        72%
     11 yrs       75%        75%
72
Another category of persons with APD who have problems with “Speed of Auditory Processing”
  • Characterized by difficulty maintaining the “pace” of ordinary conversation
  • Borderline but not profoundly abnormal auditory processing abilities
73
18 YO Female with borderline AP Abilities - PA
  • Family history of APD with affected father and brother
  • Complaint of “distracted by noise”, difficulty listening in the classroom and following directions, requests repeat of information frequently, difficulty following conversations.
74
18 YO Female with borderline AP Abilities - PA
  • IQ = 114
  • Duration Patterns Test = 100%
  • Frequency Patterns Test = 100%
  • RGDT = 2 msec.
  • Time Compressed Sentence Test = SS of 55
  • SSW NOE = normal
  • All responses to speech stimuli were delayed, with “last minute responses.”
75
18 YO Female with borderline AP Abilities - PA
76
18 YO Female with borderline AP Abilities - PA
  • Impression:
    • Borderline auditory processing skills with delays in speed of auditory processing
77
18 YO Female with borderline AP Abilities - PA
  • Recommendations:
    • Maintain perspective relative to many talents against her auditory processing skills
    • Direct methods of coping by managing her acoustic environment
    • Use of direct eye contact
    • Follow compensatory recommendations that have worked for her father
    • Continue to ask questions when she misses auditory information
    • Do not limit college choices because of mild auditory processing deficits


78
Temporal Processing Disorders:
A Quasi Hierarchy of Anatomic Site
  • Temporal Integration Cochlear
  • Auditory Brainstem Response Brainstem
  • Gap Detection BS/Cortex
  • Time Compressed Speech Cortex
  • Duration Patterns Test Cortex
79
Recommended Central Auditory Test Battery
  • Tests of peripheral auditory function
  • OAE’s
  • Monaural sensitized speech (FW, AFG)
  • Dichotic speech tests (CW, CS, SSW)
  • Tests of temporal processing:
    • Brief Tone Audiometry
    • Gap Detection
    • Time Compressed Sentences



80
A Decision Tree for Management or Remediation (Keith, 1999)
  • Disorders of temporal processing
    • Perceptual training
    • Slowing rate
  • Disorder of auditory figure ground
    • Reduce noise in environment
    • Preferential seating
    • FM system or other ALD
  • Disorders of binaural separation/maturation
    • Receptive and expressive language training
81
Time Compressed Sentence Test:
Suggestions for remediation
  • Teacher and parent awareness
  • Preferential seating and increased visual cues
  • Slow rates of speech
  • Provide information in smaller units
  • Computer assisted remediation


82
Modifications to the Speech Signal
  • Increase loudness
  • Slower rate
  • Smaller language units
  • Frequent language units
  • Reauditorization



83
Computer Assisted Remediation
  •   FastForward      www.scilearn.com
  •   Earobics            www.cogcon.com
  •   ????




84
Remediation of persons with CAPD

Tallal and colleagues

Science Vol. 271, 77-84, 1996
85
Fast ForWord*
  • “An integrated software-based training program that teaches several speech and language skills including phonics, morphology, syntax, and grammar.”


  • * Quote from www.scientificlearning.com
86
Fast ForWord Language
  • “Fast ForWord Language is a computer-based training program that rapidly develops the foundational skills known to be pre-requisites for reading.”


  • Quote from www.earobics.com


87
Fast ForWord Basics™ (Away We Go!) Early Learning Games
  • Phonological awareness
  • Working memory
  • Decoding
  • Letter-name and letter-sound association
  • Event sequencing


  • Color, shape and size identification
  • Following oral instructions
  • Eye-hand coordination
  • Memory skills


88
Fast ForWord Language
  • Phonological awareness
  • Sustained focus and attention
  • Listening comprehension
  • Language structures
89
Fast ForWord Language
  • “On average, students who train with Fast ForWord Language make language gains of 1-2 years in just 4-8 weeks.”


  • Quote from www.scilearn.com
90
Earobics*
  • “Earobics uses scientifically based and clinically proven techniques to teach listening and language skills (including phonologic awareness, auditory processing and phonics skills) that make children better readers, listeners, and learners.”


  • Quote from www.earobics.com




91
Cognitive Concepts:
Earobics Software

  • Earobics Step 1 Software
    (for developmental ages 4-7)
  • Earobics Step 2 Software
    (for developmental ages 7-10)
  • Earobics Step 1 for Adolescents & Adults Software
    (ages 10 and up)
92
Earobics Step 1
  • For developmental ages 4-7
  • Six interactive games with over 300 levels of play.
  • Teaches phonological awareness, auditory processing and introductory phonics skills required for learning to read and spell.
  • Develops general cognitive skills that support learning, such as attention and memory


  • Quotation from www.earobics.com


93
Case Studies: Temporal Processing Disorders
94
Nine Year Old Male w/ Temporal Processing Disorder
  • Auditory Fusion Test-Revised = 92 msec Time
  • Compressed Speech RE = 44%  LE = 52%*
  • SCAN
    • FW = 9%ile
    • AFG = 37%ile
    • CW = 9%ile


  • * criterian score = 80%









95
Nine Year Old Male w/ Temporal Processing Disorder
  • TOLD substests mean 29%ile
  • TAPS subtests below 18%ile
  • Lindamood = 55 (criteria = 62)
  • Spadafore Diagnostic Reading = 1.5 grade
96
Nine Year Old Male w/ Temporal Processing Disorder
  • Recommodations:
    • Comprehensive Psychoeducational Eval
    • Comprehensive Reading Eval
    • Speech and Language Therapy
    • Structured Classroom
    • Oral examinations admin one on one
    • Preferential seating, and classroom “buddy”
    • Fast ForWord
97
Eight Year Old Girl with language delay and reading problems
  • SCAN
    • FW = 16 %ile
    • AFG = 16 %ile
    • CW = 3 %ile
  • AFT-R = 120 msec.
  • Time Compressed Speech RE = 20% LE = 10%
  • SSW = 5 %ile
98
Eight Year Old Girl with language delay and reading problems
  • TOLD  = 25 to 50 %ile
  • Token Test for Children = 16 %ile
  • TAPS-Revised
    • 18 - 50 %ile for memory tests
    • 10 %ile for discrimination
99
Eight Year Old Girl with language delay and reading problems
  • Recommendations:
    • Multisensory approach to reading
    • Refer to SLP for eval and Tx.
    • Preferential Seating
    • Slow rate of instructions and check for understanding
    • Shorten directions into simple steps
    • ID computer games for auditory and reading skills